Toronto FC: where the books disagreed
In the last 30 days, MLS lines on Toronto FC games produced a cross-book net edge on 3 game-markets across 3 games — average 5.18% after fees, largest 8.21%. The book most often on one side of those: Bally Bet.
Books that disagreed on Toronto FC games
| Sportsbook | Game-markets (one side) | Measured vig |
|---|---|---|
| Bally Bet | 2 | see page → |
| betPARX | 1 | see page → |
| Fliff | 1 | see page → |
| MyBookie | 1 | see page → |
| Bovada | 1 | see page → |
Opponents in those games: Inter Miami CF (1) · Chicago Fire (1) · Orlando City SC (1)
Recent Toronto FC examples
Best detection per game-market, most recent first, net of fees. These windows have closed.
| Game | Market | Books | Net edge | Detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto FC @ Orlando City SC | totals 2.5 | Bally Bet + Bovada | 8.21% | Sep 12, 9:45 PM ET |
| Chicago Fire @ Toronto FC | totals 8.5 | Bally Bet + MyBookie | 0.67% | Sep 5, 9:34 PM ET |
| Toronto FC @ Inter Miami CF | totals 3.5 | betPARX + Fliff | 6.66% | Aug 22, 9:51 PM ET |
Frequently asked questions
How often do sportsbooks disagree on Toronto FC games?
Over the last 30 days our scanner recorded a cross-book net edge on 3 game-markets across 3 Toronto FC games — average 5.18% after fees, largest 8.21%, most recently Sep 13, 2026.
Which sportsbooks disagree most on Toronto FC?
Bally Bet (2 game-markets), betPARX (1 game-markets), Fliff (1 game-markets). A disagreement needs two books on the same line; the pair pages show which combinations recur.
Can I still bet these?
No — these windows closed within minutes of being recorded. The page is a measurement of how the market behaves around this team; the live dashboard shows what exists right now.