Chicago Fire: where the books disagreed
In the last 30 days, MLS lines on Chicago Fire games produced a cross-book net edge on 3 game-markets across 3 games — average 3.61% after fees, largest 7.14%. The book most often on one side of those: MyBookie.
Books that disagreed on Chicago Fire games
| Sportsbook | Game-markets (one side) | Measured vig |
|---|---|---|
| MyBookie | 3 | see page → |
| Bally Bet | 2 | see page → |
| Bovada | 1 | see page → |
Opponents in those games: Toronto FC (1) · New England Revolution (1) · Inter Miami CF (1)
Recent Chicago Fire examples
Best detection per game-market, most recent first, net of fees. These windows have closed.
| Game | Market | Books | Net edge | Detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New England Revolution @ Chicago Fire | totals 3.5 | Bally Bet + MyBookie | 7.14% | Sep 13, 7:35 PM ET |
| Inter Miami CF @ Chicago Fire | totals 4.5 | Bovada + MyBookie | 3.01% | Sep 9, 9:05 PM ET |
| Chicago Fire @ Toronto FC | totals 8.5 | Bally Bet + MyBookie | 0.67% | Sep 5, 9:34 PM ET |
Frequently asked questions
How often do sportsbooks disagree on Chicago Fire games?
Over the last 30 days our scanner recorded a cross-book net edge on 3 game-markets across 3 Chicago Fire games — average 3.61% after fees, largest 7.14%, most recently Sep 13, 2026.
Which sportsbooks disagree most on Chicago Fire?
MyBookie (3 game-markets), Bally Bet (2 game-markets), Bovada (1 game-markets). A disagreement needs two books on the same line; the pair pages show which combinations recur.
Can I still bet these?
No — these windows closed within minutes of being recorded. The page is a measurement of how the market behaves around this team; the live dashboard shows what exists right now.