Upgrade

Charlotte FC: where the books disagreed

In the last 30 days, MLS lines on Charlotte FC games produced a cross-book net edge on 4 game-markets across 4 games — average 3.76% after fees, largest 7.02%. The book most often on one side of those: betPARX.

Games with an arb
4
30 days
Game-markets
4
4 detections
Avg net edge
3.76%
max 7.02%
Last seen
Sep 13, 2026
MLS

Books that disagreed on Charlotte FC games

Opponents in those games: D.C. United (1) · Houston Dynamo (1) · CF Montreal (1) · FC Cincinnati (1)

Recent Charlotte FC examples

Best detection per game-market, most recent first, net of fees. These windows have closed.

GameMarketBooksNet edgeDetected
Charlotte FC @ FC Cincinnatitotals 5.5betPARX + MyBookie1.11%Sep 12, 9:30 PM ET
Charlotte FC @ CF Montrealtotals 3.5betPARX + Bovada5.08%Sep 9, 9:35 PM ET
Houston Dynamo @ Charlotte FCtotals 0.5Fliff + MyBookie1.82%Sep 5, 9:49 PM ET
D.C. United @ Charlotte FCtotals 4.5betPARX + MyBookie7.02%Aug 22, 9:36 PM ET

Frequently asked questions

How often do sportsbooks disagree on Charlotte FC games?

Over the last 30 days our scanner recorded a cross-book net edge on 4 game-markets across 4 Charlotte FC games — average 3.76% after fees, largest 7.02%, most recently Sep 13, 2026.

Which sportsbooks disagree most on Charlotte FC?

betPARX (3 game-markets), MyBookie (3 game-markets), Fliff (1 game-markets). A disagreement needs two books on the same line; the pair pages show which combinations recur.

Can I still bet these?

No — these windows closed within minutes of being recorded. The page is a measurement of how the market behaves around this team; the live dashboard shows what exists right now.

← all teams · MLS arbitrage · sportsbook vig rankings

Charlotte FC arbitrage: 4 games where the books disagreed (30 days, measured) · ArbMonster