Arizona Cardinals: where the books disagreed
In the last 30 days, NFL lines on Arizona Cardinals games produced a cross-book net edge on 2 game-markets across 1 games — average 2.93% after fees, largest 7.33%. The book most often on one side of those: BetMGM.
Books that disagreed on Arizona Cardinals games
| Sportsbook | Game-markets (one side) | Measured vig |
|---|---|---|
| BetMGM | 1 | see page → |
| Bovada | 1 | see page → |
| BetRivers | 1 | see page → |
| FanDuel | 1 | see page → |
Opponents in those games: Los Angeles Chargers (2)
Recent Arizona Cardinals examples
Best detection per game-market, most recent first, net of fees. These windows have closed.
| Game | Market | Books | Net edge | Detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona Cardinals @ Los Angeles Chargers | spreads 11.5 | BetRivers + FanDuel | 1.68% | Sep 13, 7:20 PM ET |
| Arizona Cardinals @ Los Angeles Chargers | h2h | BetMGM + Bovada | 7.33% | Sep 13, 7:20 PM ET |
Frequently asked questions
How often do sportsbooks disagree on Arizona Cardinals games?
Over the last 30 days our scanner recorded a cross-book net edge on 2 game-markets across 1 Arizona Cardinals games — average 2.93% after fees, largest 7.33%, most recently Sep 13, 2026.
Which sportsbooks disagree most on Arizona Cardinals?
BetMGM (1 game-markets), Bovada (1 game-markets), BetRivers (1 game-markets). A disagreement needs two books on the same line; the pair pages show which combinations recur.
Can I still bet these?
No — these windows closed within minutes of being recorded. The page is a measurement of how the market behaves around this team; the live dashboard shows what exists right now.