Upgrade

Austin FC: where the books disagreed

In the last 30 days, MLS lines on Austin FC games produced a cross-book net edge on 4 game-markets across 4 games — average 2.94% after fees, largest 6.57%. The book most often on one side of those: betPARX.

Games with an arb
4
30 days
Game-markets
4
7 detections
Avg net edge
2.94%
max 6.57%
Last seen
Sep 14, 2026
MLS

Books that disagreed on Austin FC games

SportsbookGame-markets (one side)Measured vig
betPARX4see page →
MyBookie3see page →
Fliff1see page →

Opponents in those games: Philadelphia Union (1) · San Jose Earthquakes (1) · Vancouver Whitecaps FC (1) · Colorado Rapids (1)

Recent Austin FC examples

Best detection per game-market, most recent first, net of fees. These windows have closed.

GameMarketBooksNet edgeDetected
Austin FC @ Vancouver Whitecaps FCtotals 3.5betPARX + MyBookie6.57%Sep 13, 8:36 PM ET
Colorado Rapids @ Austin FCtotals 2.5betPARX + MyBookie2.06%Sep 9, 10:36 PM ET
San Jose Earthquakes @ Austin FCtotals 1.5betPARX + Fliff1.95%Sep 5, 10:50 PM ET
Philadelphia Union @ Austin FCtotals 2.5betPARX + MyBookie3.98%Aug 22, 11:07 PM ET

Frequently asked questions

How often do sportsbooks disagree on Austin FC games?

Over the last 30 days our scanner recorded a cross-book net edge on 4 game-markets across 4 Austin FC games — average 2.94% after fees, largest 6.57%, most recently Sep 14, 2026.

Which sportsbooks disagree most on Austin FC?

betPARX (4 game-markets), MyBookie (3 game-markets), Fliff (1 game-markets). A disagreement needs two books on the same line; the pair pages show which combinations recur.

Can I still bet these?

No — these windows closed within minutes of being recorded. The page is a measurement of how the market behaves around this team; the live dashboard shows what exists right now.

← all teams · MLS arbitrage · sportsbook vig rankings

Austin FC arbitrage: 4 games where the books disagreed (30 days, measured) · ArbMonster